2016 DOL Fiduciary Rule Confusion

2016 DOL Fiduciary Rule change sparks lawsuits and confusion among industry firms and advisors

Download the DOL Fiduciary Rule guide

Guide to 2016 Fiduciary Rule

Since the adoption of the Fiduciary rule change in April 2016, BDs and RIAs are scrambling to understand how it will affect them, what to change, how to implement it, and whether or not the stemming lawsuits will prevail. Many compliance officers are confused by the new standard taking place and even further concerned about making changes that will later be reversed if the rule itself is reversed.

Firms cannot count on the flurry of lawsuits to stop this bit of legislation. However they may result in a few changes or further clarifying language. 

What are the Fiduciary rule lawsuits all about?

BICE: Best Interest Contract exemption | The BIC exemption

In May 2016, FINRA weighed in on the fiduciary rule, citing that some parts were likely to be problematic for the broker community and could damper business. The primary objection among industry dealers is the BIC exemption. Here is how BICE works;

The new DOL rule forbids variable commissions in conducting transactions of retirement investment accounts and deems variable commission opportunities as an inherent conflict of interest. However, firms may still use sales commission based models if the arrangements meet the described standard of “reasonable compensation” and they provide information to their client of the transactions’ commission based compensation structure.  Further, advisors must be certain to give prudent and impartial advice.

This provision was added to allow brokers to continue selling some commission based products if they pledge to act in the client’s best interest. The clause is backed up by a provision that if investors feel they have been misrepresented by advisors, they may file a private lawsuit, and more frightening, they may pursue advisors using a private class action lawsuit.  

Organizations such as SIFMA are asking the court to review the BIC clause on the grounds that the Department of Labor has overstepped its bounds in creating a new legal risk for financial advisors who will now face the threat of private lawsuits.  SIFMA further asserts opening this advantage to investors will ultimately result in fewer product choices with higher fees because firms will be wary of working with senior and retirement investors at all. Small firms will likely pull out of the market altogether due to risk concerns, placing an undue burden on smaller broker-dealer firms.

As of June 2016 there are as many as 5 lawsuits over the Fiduciary Rule, most asserting the DOL overstepped authority by;

  • Expanding the definition of “fiduciary” to where it contradicts with existing law,
  • Unlawfully creating a private right for citizens to proliferate lawsuits against advisors,
  • Unlawfully extending fiduciary responsibilities already covered under ERISA to apply to retirement accounts,
  • Unduly restricting the First Amendment free speech rights of investment advisors,
  • Failure to consider the undue burden on small brokerage and investment advisory businesses,
  • And, unfairly disfavoring certain retirement products over others.

Will the lawsuits prevail?

Industry experts seem to believe the lawsuits may result in modifications to the fiduciary rule but will not absolve the 2016 DOL Fiduciary Rule altogether. Our advice to firms is to err on the side of caution. Analyze retirement investment products and commission structures; make a list of ones that will likely need to be modified. Start now to consider changes needed in policy and procedures manuals. Consider how and when you will implement staff training programs. Expect to make solid changes to disclosures, commission programs on retirement products, and written procedures by the end of the year. Putting in the effort now, will make it easy to back off any unnecessary changes later.

We’d like to hear what you think of the 2016 Fiduciary Rule. Is it too restrictive or long overdue?  Leave a comment below

Link to SIFMA lawsuit filed to challenge the DOL Fiduciary Rule (Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association)  

 

Need help bringing compliance policies up to meet the new DOL fiduciary rule standards? We can help with monthly compliance services, special projects, or consulting:

Broker Dealer Compliance Services – 

Regulatory Consulting 

RIA Compliance Programs

For more information or a quote, send us a message:

Fields marked with an * are required


0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *